Latest Activity

Robert Dickinson commented on Robert Dickinson's group Stream of Information
"Brixham, England May. 29, 2012 "
7 hours ago
Robert Dickinson commented on Robert Dickinson's group Stream of Information
"by jasonkillinger. Browse more data visualizations. "
8 hours ago
Robert Dickinson left a comment for kerma ben
"Welcome Kerma!"
19 hours ago
kerma ben is now a member of SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
yesterday
Robert Dickinson added a page to the group SWMM4 Input Files
Thumbnail

Historical SWMM 5 and SWMM 4 Engines and Examples

Subject:  Historical SWMM 5 and SWMM 4 Engines and Examples   The web site has http://swmm5legacycode.ning.com/  historical SWMM 5 installs, SWMM 5 input file examples and SWMM 4 input files and engines.   The SWMM 4 engines go back to SWMM 3.5…
yesterday
Robert Dickinson commented on Robert Dickinson's group SWMM4 Input Files
"Subject:  Historical SWMM 5 and SWMM 4 Engines and Examples   The web site has http://swmm5legacycode.ning.com/  historical SWMM 5 installs, SWMM 5 input file examples and SWMM 4 input files and engines.   The SWMM…"
yesterday
Robert Dickinson added a page to the group Blog Links
Thumbnail

SWMM5.NET

15 GPM 1985 1D Components in InfoSWMM 2D 3 Types of Manholes in SWMM 5 and InfoSWMM 3 Types of Subcatchment Flow in SWMM 5 A Basic InfoSewer Wet Well A feedback loop involves four distinct stages A rise in Pipe Inverts Across a SWMM 5 Node A…
yesterday
Robert Dickinson posted groups
yesterday
Robert Dickinson commented on Robert Dickinson's group Stream of Information
"Udaipur, India May. 28, 2012 "
yesterday
Robert Dickinson posted photos
yesterday
Robert Dickinson commented on Robert Dickinson's group Weather
"Man-made Pollution Shifting Tropics and Sub-Tropics Poleward "If a poleward displacement of the mid-latitude storm tracks also occurs, this will shift mid-latitude precipitation poleward, impacting regional agriculture, economy, and…"
yesterday
Robert Dickinson commented on Robert Dickinson's group Weather
"Poor neighborhoods have fewer trees, as these jarring satellite photos reveal.: http://www.treehugger.com/economics/how-spot-income-inequality-space-look-trees.html"
yesterday
Robert Dickinson commented on Robert Dickinson's group Weather
" Climate Change is Frying Our Cities Rising temperatures are set triple the heat-related deaths in cities across the U.S., a new report finds. Cities need to fight back."
yesterday
Robert Dickinson posted a video

RSA Animate - The Power of Networks

In this new RSA Animate, Manuel Lima, senior UX design lead at Microsoft Bing, explores the power of network visualisation to help navigate our complex moder...
Monday
Profile IconThere are 291 members on SWMM5 - Stormwater Management Model
Sunday
Robert Dickinson commented on Robert Dickinson's group ExtraVariables
"Update of May, 20012 Epaswmm5.exe swmm5.dll"
Sunday
Robert Dickinson commented on Robert Dickinson's group Stream of Information
"Ocean Currents "
Sunday
Robert Dickinson replied to Robert Dickinson's discussion How is the St Venant Equation Solved for in the Dynamic Wave Solution of SWMM 5?
"Subject:   Link Iterations in the SWMM 5 Dynamic Wave Solution   Each of the links in the SWMM 5 network can use up to 8 iterations to reach convergence during a time step in the dynamic wave solution of SWMM 5.  The rules…"
Sunday
Robert Dickinson left a comment for wu ze jian
Saturday
Robert Dickinson posted a discussion

How is the St Venant Equation Solved for in the Dynamic Wave Solution of SWMM 5?

Subject:   How is the St Venant Equation Solved for in the Dynamic Wave Solution of SWMM 5? An explanation of the four St. Venant Terms in SWMM 5 and how they change for Gravity Mains and Force Mains. The HGL is the water surface elevation in the upstream and downstream nodes of the link. The HGL for a full link goes from the pipe crown elevation up to the rim elevation of the node + the surcharge depth of the node.  The four terms are: dq2 = Time Step * Awtd * (Head Downstream – Head Upstream)…See More
Saturday

SWMM 3,4,5 uses a spatial step equal to the length of the link. Or, in terms of the 1D St. Venant Equation for the calculation of flow used in SWMM 5:



In which is the length of the conduit.

The program will calculate the cross sectional area, hydraulic radius top width and depth at the upstream, midpoint and downstream sections of the link. The link solution is pivoted on the midpoint cross sectional area in the dominant dynamic wave terms and
and the non-linear term in the dynamic wave equation uses the upstream and downstream link cross sectional areas. In the finite difference equation in SWMM 5 the pipe shown below would have one length but use the cross sectional information from the upstream, midpoint and downstream points of the link.

The bend in the pipe would be modeled using the "other" category of losses



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Views: 22

Replies to This Discussion

Option "Define Supercritical Flow By" does inside the SWMM 5 engine. The options are called Slope, Froude and Bothin the GUI and in the engine of SWMM 5. A few other variable definitions you need to know to understand this explanation are: (1) Y1 for the upstream link depth, (2) Y2 for the downstream link depth, (3) Q for the flow in the link, (4)Qfull for the full Manning's equation flow or normal flow for the link based on the bed slope, (5) Froude1 and Froude2 for the Froude Number respectively of the upstream and downstream ends of the link, (6) n for Manning's roughness, (7) Yfull for the maximum depth of the link and (8) Qnormal for the Normal Flow equation flow based on the upstream area of the link (A1) and the upstream hydraulic radius (R1).


In the SWMM 5 engine these options are used after the dynamic wave equation flow is estimated using the St. Venant equation. The option that you choose is only active for those links that have a flow greater than 0, links with negative flow use the dynamic wave equation flow exclusively. It the flow is positive and the link is an open channel and full then the minimum of the dynamic wave flow or Qfull is used as the new flow in the link. If the flow is positive and the depth at the upstream end of the link or Y1 is less than Yfull then the engine will compare Qnormal to Q using the routines in Check Normal Flow.


If the link gets to the Check Normal Flow routines then it uses the following logic:
  • If the Slope or Both option is used or either the upstream node or the downstream node of the link is an outfall AND Y1 is less than Y2 then the minimum of Q from the dynamic wave equation or Q from the Normal Flow equation is used as the current iteration flow in link, or
  • If the Froude or Both option AND either the upstream Froude Number or the downstream Froude number is greater than 1 then the minimum of Q from the dynamic wave equation or Q from the Normal Flow equation is used as the current iteration flow in link. This condition is never used if either of the connecting nodes of the link are outfalls.

How does this work in the actual flow that SWMM 5 estimates for a link? Consider this example in which the link flow in blue is plotted with the Qnormal flow in red and the Q dynamic wave equation flow in purple:

Qnormal is



Qnormal is only calculated when the link is not full so in the plot a Qnormal of 0 means that the pipe was full. At other times the flow in the link was equal to Qnormal as the minimum of the dynamic equation flow or the Qnormal flow is used at each iteration in the solution process. The flow is normally bounded by the Qnormal flow in SWMM 5.0.013. Your choice of the options Slope, Froude andBoth really only impact the conditions under which this comparison is true. If you use Froude or Both then Supercritical flow at either end of the link will trigger this comparison will be the dynamic wave equation flow and the Froude number at each end of the link.


RSS

© 2012   Created by Robert Dickinson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service